Saturday, November 10, 2012

10 things I've learned from working in IT

I?ve been a part of the IT industry (in one capacity or another) for nearly 20 years now. During those years, I?ve seen all sorts of trends, thoughts, and events come and go like the wind. I?ve experienced people with a vast range of skills and interests, and I?ve seen and heard dog and pony shows from more companies than I care to remember.

While I?ve held my post(s) within the IT industry, I?ve learned a few random things about the industry itself that I wanted to share with all the good readers of TechRepublic. So hold onto your seat, it?s gonna be a bumpy ride.

1: Companies always promise more than they can deliver

This is almost across the board. A company will promise you the moon, telling you that their product will solve every problem your company has. But sales pitches should never be believed. If you want to know the truth about a product, you find forums (like TechRepublic) where end users and other IT pros chat about products. The company I work for recently had a new backup solution vendor promise that its product would not have all the failings our current product had. And it did solve some of the issues ? but it had plenty of its own. Remember, if it?s too good to be true, most likely it?s not true.

2: If you add third-party software to a Windows machine, all bets are off

In a perfect world, you could add any software, from any vendor, and everything would simply work. We don?t live in that perfect world. I have found over the years that when you add non-Microsoft software to a machine, to differing degrees, you compromise the stability and reliability of the platform. If you really want the most stable Windows platform you can get, install only software from Microsoft.

3: It?s not a matter of ?if? but ?when? your desktop or server will be compromised

Whether you use a desktop or a server, if you?re using Windows, you will be compromised. This does not necessarily mean a hacker or something catastrophic. But you will wind up with a virus, malware, or more. No matter what antivirus software you use, you will eventually find yourself having to rid a machine of something malicious.

4: Most people don?t really understand RAID

I can?t tell you how many people I?ve dealt with who look at RAID as little more than a backup. If you need a backup, use a backup. If you need redundancy, use RAID. But even more important ? RAID disks fail! If you don?t pay attention to those failures (and replace disks as needed), you will wind up with a dead machine that will take hours (or days) to bring back to life. Understand RAID before you use it.

5: Backups are always forgotten? until they?re needed

Most people don?t even back up. And those who do usually assume it?s ?set it and forget it.? I?ve been focusing on backups (for multiple clients) for a while now, and if there?s one thing I?ve learned it?s that backups can?t be trusted. You must monitor them; you must babysit them. If you don?t, one of these days you are going to need that backup and it won?t be there.

6: The cloud will never replace the desktop

Just a few short years ago, rumors spread about this ubiquitous technology called ?the cloud,? and everyone pretty much thought it would take over the desktop. Some of us had visions of old thin clients making a comeback. The truth is, the cloud wound up being something used by the desktop. It will never actually replace the desktop. We need that desktop OS; otherwise, failure and lost data will become rampant. But no matter what the early expectations were, the cloud has turned out to be a nice addition to what we already had.

7: The Linux platform is still hindered by FUD

That?s right: Fear, uncertainty, and doubt still plague the open source flagship platform. Most of those who rail against Linux do so out of either ignorance or fear. Linux fits in perfectly alongside both Windows and OS X on the server AND the desktop. And Linux will continue to gain traction in both personal and business usage. Although the biggest perpetrators of the Linux FUD have pulled back drastically, others still feed the machine daily. I can?t imagine this will go away any time soon.

8: There?s a huge disconnect between pundits and the real world

Most pundits live in this glorious cloud in the sky where reality has little to no bearing. Reality is that most businesses can?t afford to upgrade every year, that people still desperately cling to old technology because it works and because they fear change, and that the newest and shiniest isn?t always the best.

9: IT will give you gray hair

I?ve seen it countless times. People come into the business with nice jet black hair and after only a year or so, the gray hair starts sprouting. Why? IT is stressful. You have people?s business in your hand. Your ability to fix problems is critical to end users getting their jobs done. Or worse ? you?re working with a company?s QuickBooks data file and you have a business breathing down your neck to make sure it can continue. It?s a rough business that will chew you up and spit you out. Thin skinned need not apply.

10: The second you think you understand something, you don?t

Technology changes faster than the speed of thought. The second you?ve wrapped your brain around something, it completely changes and you have to start from scratch. Never sit still, never give up learning, and always know the second you close your eyes you will be behind the curve and someone else will steal your business.

Other lessons?

We?ve all learned something in this business. For me, the learning never stops. Every day, a new particle worth my interest worms its way into my brain and is cached for later use. Over the years, some of those bits and pieces have become worthless junk, but others have proven valuable. What lessons have you learned during your years as an IT pro that have stuck with you? Share them with fellow TechRepublic members.

Source: http://projectcommunityonline.com/10-things-ive-learned-from-working-in-it.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=10-things-ive-learned-from-working-in-it

kim kardashian flour bomb hunger games box office xavier joan crawford joan crawford john goodman kendall marshall

Friday, November 9, 2012

In Zimbabwe, Satellite Dishes are Widespread and New Media are ...

Bruce Sherman, Director, Office of Strategy and Development, BBG

Bruce Sherman, Director, Office of Strategy and Development, BBG

Word of mouth and radio remain the primary sources of receiving news and information in Zimbabwe, but satellite ownership and the use of mobile devices to access the Internet are growing rapidly, according to new data issued by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) and Gallup.

?Even youth are still turning to radio to get the news on a regular basis,? said Jenna Levy, Consulting Specialist, Gallup, ?though they are more likely also to use new media.?

About 6 in 10 Zimbabweans say they have a working radio in their home (59.8%), and half have a working television (47.2%). Mobile phones, by far the most popular platform for accessing the Internet in Zimbabwe, are even more prevalent, with 75.6% reporting that they have a mobile phone in their household. In urban areas, mobile penetration approaches 100%.

Read the Research Brief
View the Presentation

?The notion that Zimbabwe is a radio-only market is outdated,? said Sonja Gloeckle, Africa Research Analyst, International Broadcasting Bureau, adding that ?new media helps us reach out directly to people in Zimbabwe?

For the past several years, Zimbabwe has been a leader in Sub-Saharan Africa for satellite dish ownership, and this trend has further intensified. About two-thirds of Zimbabwean television owners say their TVs receive its signal via an individual satellite dish (65.8%) or shared satellite dish (2.0%), while a similar percentage (68.2%) use an antenna. TV has become a key means of reaching urban Zimbabweans, with nearly half watching television at 8 p.m. and just 7 percent listen to the radio at that time.

Past-week Internet use has more than doubled in the past year, standing now at 22 percent, and 9 in 10 regular Internet users go online through a mobile phone. Three quarters of regular Internet users name Facebook among their top three websites for news and information.

More than 8 in 10 of Zimbabweans who have their own mobile phones or have access to one (85.1%) say they used their phone to send an SMS/text message in the last week. Approximately one in four users accessed the Internet (25.6%), accessed Facebook or other social media (24.3%) or listened to the radio (24.1%) on their phones.

The BBG?s global audience research program is conducted in partnership with Gallup. The data on Zimbabwe, like that on Iran, Tibet, Burma, Nigeria and Indonesia released earlier this year, shows how communications technologies are evolving even as traditional broadcasts in TV and radio continue to play a significant role in news distribution. This research informs the current and future operations of the agency?s broadcasts in 59 languages to more than 100 countries.

Related

Source: http://www.bbg.gov/press-release/in-zimbabwe-satellite-dishes-are-widespread-and-new-media-are-growing-rapidly/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=in-zimbabwe-satellite-dishes-are-widespread-and-new-media-are-growing-rapidly

meteor showers 2012 ufc 145 jones vs evans marian hossa philip humber red sox white sox

Analysis: Exports will be next divisive U.S. oil tangle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama faces a challenge in his second term that was unthinkable a few years ago: how to adapt an energy policy focused on oil imports and scarcity to an era of rapidly growing domestic production.

After decades when the concept of energy independence seemed a pipe dream, the river of oil flowing from shale formations in North Dakota and Texas is reshaping U.S. energy policy. With oil and gas output increasing, the United States is quickly entering an era where it will have to decide how to manage its newfound energy wealth.

While the debate over liquefied natural gas exports is well known, another issue is emerging: whether to allow the export of crude oil.

A 37-year-old law imposed after the Arab oil embargo effectively bans all but a handful of specific shipments. Yet the president has the power to allow exports in instances deemed to be in the country's interest, placing Obama squarely in the middle of this policy quandary.

The light, sweet crude coming from the nation's shale formations is not well suited for the U.S. Gulf Coast refining hub - a disconnect that makes it more profitable for oil companies to send oil abroad and import crude that is better matched to Gulf refiners.

The shifting dynamics could force the Obama administration, which spent the months prior to the election boasting about America's increasing oil supplies, to at least examine whether the door should be opened to more crude oil exports.

While allowing more exports might help companies' bottom lines, it could be a tough sell, as some lawmakers have already called for restricting other energy exports.

Critics of such exports argue that U.S. resources should be used at home to keep prices down for consumers.

With the United States still a net importer of crude oil and public angst over gasoline prices ever-present, the prospect of tankers laden with U.S.-produced crude oil destined for Europe and points beyond will almost certainly draw potent opposition.

At least one lawmaker is already looking into current crude oil export applications. U.S. Representative Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat and vocal critic of U.S. energy exports, recently asked the Commerce Department to turn over information about all crude oil export applications for further study.

"The politics of this are very hard to change," said Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners. "They're a part of our national character and have been ever since (former President) Jimmy Carter donned a cardigan."

INDUSTRY LOBBYING ON THE WAY

Despite the tricky political implications, energy companies are soon likely to clamor for change. They point to a growing surplus of the prized light, sweet crude that is most commonly produced from shale reservoirs, which they say would fetch a higher price on global markets.

In turn, Gulf Coast refiners that invested billions of dollars in sophisticated refining equipment, much of which is now idle, could buy more of the cheaper, heavy imported oil the equipment was meant to process.

Refineries on the U.S. East Coast are better suited for lighter crudes, but there is no pipeline system to transport oil there from the Bakken or Eagle Ford shale formations.

"There's going to be an industry lobbying effort to change the law," said Guy Caruso, former head of the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

"We could see some move in that direction as soon as next year," said Caruso, now a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The Obama administration has not officially weighed in on the crude oil exports issue. At least one administration appointee has said the United States should be open to exports, however.

Adam Sieminski, the head of the Energy Information Administration, which does not advocate policy, said crude oil exports could benefit the U.S. economy.

The pressure is building. This year, BP won approval for limited shipments to Canada, a trade that has been generally allowed for years if the crude is then re-imported after refining or consumed in Canada. But the bigger opportunity may be shipments from the Gulf Coast to markets farther afield.

LAW DATES TO ARAB OIL EMBARGO ERA

The main law governing U.S. crude oil exports is the 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act.

Passed in the aftermath of the Arab oil embargo of the early 1970s, the law requires the president to restrict trade of domestically produced crude oil outside the country. Only a handful of other commodities are similarly regulated, including such things as unprocessed Western red cedar and horses exported by sea.

While companies can easily export crude oil products, such as gasoline and diesel, sending unrefined crude oil out of the country requires a license from the Bureau of Industry and Security in the Commerce Department.

Unlike other policy areas that require legislative action to change, the president is able to expand crude oil exports when a finding is made that doing so is in the country's best interest.

President Ronald Reagan made such findings in 1985 and 1988 to permit exports to Canada, as well as the finding in 1985 that allowed exports from Alaska's Cook Inlet. In 1992, President George Bush approved the limited export of heavy crude oil from California after environmental laws in the state greatly reduced demand domestically.

In both cases, these exceptions were made for crude oil production that was relatively cut off from the rest of the nation and in which access to foreign markets was necessary to support the output.

Exports are also allowed in some cases where the crude is part of a swap that will result in an equal amount of petroleum products being imported into the United States. In these cases, companies have to prove the crude oil could not have been reasonably marketed domestically.

Former Commerce Department officials said crude oil applications have typically made up only a small part of the export bureau's work.

"I don't think these laws existed at any time we've had an oil surplus," said Bill Reinsch, who was Undersecretary for the Export Administration at the Commerce Department in the 1990s under President Bill Clinton.

"They were designed to deal with when we have an oil deficit. We still do, but it's not the same," said Reinsch, who is now president of the National Foreign Trade Council.

TEST CASE IN NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY

Oil and gas companies already face resistance as they push the government to allow more exports of natural gas.

U.S. shale gas output has also skyrocketed in recent years. The United States is positioned to be a net exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the next few years if the federal government approves more export projects.

After signing off on Cheniere's Sabine Pass export project, the Obama administration has repeatedly postponed decisions on further exports as it awaits a comprehensive economic analysis of the effects of exports.

Lawmakers and some manufacturers have also raised concerns about whether gas exports will raise prices and harm consumers.

"Investors need to prepare themselves for the idea that what happened with LNG will happen with crude, and it will happen faster and bigger, too," Book said.

(Reporting by Ayesha Rascoe; editing by Ros Krasny and Douglas Royalty)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-exports-next-divisive-u-oil-tangle-231239280--finance.html

polling place washington post yahoo news comedy central philadelphia eagles obamacare Todd Akin

Thursday, November 1, 2012

New York Harbor "unlikely" to fully reopen Wednesday: U.S. Coast Guard

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"95400240","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-1311091132", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-1311091132", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "95400240", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "95400240" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });